Jurisprudence is the study that deals with the fundamental principles and various concepts of law. It guides a person to understand the deeper meaning of law. The word jurisprudence is derived from the Latin term “Jurisprudentia” which means “knowledge of the law”. Basically ‘Jure’ means law and ‘prudentia’ means knowledge. Thus, the meaning of the entire word signifies a practical knowledge of law and its various applications.

The aim of Jurisprudence is to help a layman understand the deeper meaning of the law. Jurisprudence is a crucial part of the law which is entirely based on theories and various analyses. Jurisprudence focuses on the relationship of law with society, social science, and so on.

WHAT IS JURISPRUDENCE?

Jurisprudence means the study of law that takes place in a logical and philosophical manner. Jurisprudence analyses the nature of law, legal systems, legal rules, legal concepts, and legal institutions and creates a way to understand the social, political as well and cultural arenas where law operates. It is a vast field that consists of a range of perspectives which includes natural law, legal realism, critical legal studies, and so on. The study of jurisprudence helps scholars and practitioners to develop a deeper understanding of law and its importance in shaping society.

HISTORY OF JURISPRUDENCE

Jurisprudence began in the Roman Times with the Romans scrutinizing the importance of the law and the nature of the law. Although it had a restrictive approach as the ideas of law and ethics were blurred. After the fall of the Roman Empire, their set of ideas regarding jurisprudence vanished and the Christian State emerged. With the rise of Christian Rule, the concept of secularism arose. Several hypotheses and concepts were proposed by renowned personalities.

Gradually, the possibility of positive law and positive methodologies took over whereby the limits of the law were divided. With the evolution of ideologies, several jurists presented their own interpretations of jurisprudence.

In natural law, Jurisprudence was co-related with rights based on morals and divine law. In the analytical school, the law was considered as Command of Sovereignty. Every jurist had their own take on jurisprudence which we are about to discuss in the next topic.

DEFINITION BY DIFFERENT PHILOSOPHERS

There were many different meanings that were assigned to the term Jurisprudence by several philosophers. However, no single definition was universally possible to accept as Jurisprudence deals with concepts that regulate human behavior in accordance with the conduct, values, needs, and goals of every societal dimension which keeps on changing from time to time.

Nonetheless, in order to understand the concept of jurisprudence in a better way, it becomes essential to examine some of the definitions by famous philosophers.

1. John Austin’s Remark on Jurisprudence

John Austin was the founder of the Analytical School of Jurisprudence and was also considered as the Father of English Jurisprudence. He was the first jurist to term jurisprudence as a “Science of Law” which deals with the analysis of various concepts or their underlying principles. Austin considered the subject of jurisprudence as positive law. His ideology revolved around the notion that jurisprudence is not a moral philosophy but rather a systematically aligned study of actual law as distinguished from moral or natural law.

2.  Holland’s Remark on Jurisprudence

Holland defined jurisprudence as “the formal science of positive law”. According to Holland, formal science is the arena that deals with several relations that are regulated by legal rules rather than with the rules themselves that guide these relations. Thus, for Holland jurisprudence was a formal science and not a material science. Just like Austin, Holland also considered jurisprudence as a positive law.

3. Salmond’s Remark on Jurisprudence

According to Salmond’s point of view, Jurisprudence can be divided into two senses, the generic sense which is defined as the “Science of Civil Law” and the specific sense which can be defined as the “Science of the First Principle of Civil Law”. For Salmond, jurisprudence in the specific sense includes theoretical jurisprudence so it doesn’t deal with concrete details but rather deals with fundamental principles and conceptions.

IMPORTANCE OF THE STUDY OF JURISPRUDENCE

One of the most crucial importance of the study of Jurisprudence is its fundamental value. Jurisprudence mainly consists of research and the method to construct and clarify the basic concepts of law. Jurisprudence has nothing to do with the creation of new laws, rather its main focus stays on the existing laws that are present in the system. The theories and analysis can help the lawyers in making their fundamentals strong.

Jurisprudence can also be a guiding light for the students. It has a major scholastic value in the life of students. The impact of jurisprudence is not just limited to primary legal rules, rather it also talks about the social impact of the same laws.

Jurisprudence is an amalgamation of logical and theoretical analysis of legal concepts. Thus, it escalates the analytical methods and techniques of a student which helps him/her to grow strong with the legal fundamentals.

Jurisprudence also focuses on social values. It talks about equity and fairness. Jurisprudence deals with the basic fundamentals of the law and it is considered as the eye of law. It creates a bridge for people to understand the thoughts and divisions of law.

SCHOOLS OF THOUGHT IN JURISPRUDENCE 

The schools of thought in jurisprudence are the several theoretical approaches that aim to understand the nature, purpose, and functionality of society. These approaches vary in their fundamental assumptions about the law, the role of the state, and the relationship between law, morality, and society.

There are 5 schools of thought in jurisprudence. Let’s have a quick glance at all of them to understand the theories better.

• Philosophical School

The Philosophical School aims at the theory of natural law. This school tries to find out the reason why a law is enacted and what are the consequences of such a law in our daily lives. They have faith that the purpose of the law is to enhance the nobility of humanity.

• Historical School

The Historical School runs in a belief that law is a consequence of years of evolution of our society. The historical school believes that the sources of law are related to religious philosophies, customs, and, societal norms. Historical school is too past-oriented, nonetheless, it still states that the law must change with the people.

• Analytical School

Analytical School is mostly about the theory of imperative law. It is related to the origin of Civil Law. Analytical School revolves around the concept of rights and duties. It also emphasizes legal models such as acts and contracts. Analytical School of the law runs by the ideology that the law should be codified and it must be governed by the state with the aim of benefitting people.

• Sociological School 

Sociological School concentrates majorly on the function of law rather than its impalpable content. The sociological school had an aim to connect law with society and law can be adjusted according to the requirement of the society. Sociological schools are all about doctrines, legal institutions, law and justice, and other theoretical aspects of law.

• Realist School

Technically, the Realist School is not a school of jurisprudence. The school is more based on tutoring of thoughts. The school focuses much more on the actions of the Court and what they create. Realist schools hardly make any logical assumptions from the general law.

BEST BOOKS TO KNOW MORE ABOUT JURISPRUDENCE

1.  Jurisprudence Explained by Hijam N.K. Singh

Jurisprudence Explained is particularly and specifically designed for students pursuing the three-year or five-year degree law course. It is one of the best books for reference as it covers nature of law, legal concepts like Duty, Rights, Wrongs, possession, and so on. It has got all relevant cases along with their reasonings too. This book is a perfect reference for students, lawyers, as well as judges.

2. Introduction to Jurisprudence by Avtar Singh & Prof. (Dr) Harpreet Kaur

Introduction to Jurisprudence is a study of the principles of law. It has a phenomenal presentation of schools and theories of law along with their critical examination. The book covers basic understanding of concepts and keeps a check on the latest trends of Jurisprudence.

3. Lectures in Jurisprudence by N.K. Jayakumar

Lectures in Jurisprudence by N.K. Jayakumar is definitely a go-to book for all the law aspirants and law students. The book has interesting references along with different dimension of law explained properly. The book is thoroughly revised and updated and every topic as well as principles have been covered in a great way.

 CONCLUSION

Thus, this blog showed us how jurisprudence plays a pivotal role in the development of legal systems as it provides a critical framework for understanding the law and its underlying principles. Jurisprudence paves the path through which we gain knowledge about the basic principles of law and the sources from which they are derived.

Moreover, jurisprudence is not just about theories, it also has a practical implication. It guides lawyers, judges, and policymakers in framing important legal decisions that are just and fair.

Overall, Jurisprudence is a marvellous and multifaceted field of study that has absolute importance in the vast dimension of law.

FAQS

1. What are the 4 types of jurisprudence?

 Ans:-  (a) Academic

(b) Comparative

(c) Ethical

(d) Philosophical

2. Who is known as the father of jurisprudence?

Ans:- Bentham is considered as the father of jurisprudence.

3. What does jurisprudence mean in common law?

 Ans:- Jurisprudence in common law is a body of unwritten laws based on judicial precedents. The concept is based mostly on institutionalized judgments and interpretations from the courts. Common law also illustrates the encouragement for the implementation of new legislation.

4. What is jurisprudence law in India?

Ans:- Jurisprudence is the study based on the science of law. The study is nit based on any particular statute or any rule but of law in general, its principles, and several concepts. The primary aim of the interpretation is to discover the real intention of the Legislature.

Interpretation is the process to determine the meaning of the statutes or other legal provision. Statutes are also known as legislative enactment or backbone of any legal system. These statutes are the primary source of most of the law jurisdictions. And statutes are play the vital role in regulation of all aspect of the society.

The judiciary holds an essential responsibility of interpreting the existing statutes and laws. When courts administer justice in disputes they strictly adhere to the boundaries established by the framework, which includes various laws, statutes, the Constitution and delegated legislations. In nations, like India, the legal framework comprises a multitude of legislations and regulations.

This interpretation of statues is challenging and complex but this is the most important part to ensuring that, law is applied fairly and uniformly.

What is Interpretation of statutes?

Interpretation of statutes is the backbone of our legal system. This is the process of determining the meaning of any law. This interpretation of statues is challenging and complex but this is the most important part to ensuring that, law is applied fairly and uniformly.

Statutes are the primary source of most jurisdiction in law. It is a law enacted by a legislative body. Statutes play the most vital role in regulating all aspect of our legal system. But at the same time it can be quite complex, that time interpretation of statues comes in.

What is Construction of Statutes?

Statutory construction also referred as Interpretation of statutes. It is a fundamental legal processor. The use of Constructed of Statutes is to determining the meaning and application of statutes. It is also challenging and complex in task but it ensures that the law is applied uniformly and fairly.

To understand a statute, courts use variety of tools and techniques. There are a set of principle and rules use to interpret the statutes. Court generally give the plain and ordinary meaning of the statutes, unless the statute is confusing or that meaning would lead to a wrong result. Sometimes courts may consider the legislative history of a statute like committee reports and debates to help to understand the statute’s meaning.

Related books

“Interpretation of Statutes” by N S Bindra

“Principles of Statutory Interpretation” by Justice G P Singh

Difference Between Interpretation and Construction

INTERPRETATION

Interpretation and construction form the principles in analysing statutes allowing courts to effectively apply and uphold the rule of law. Although these concepts are interconnected they serve purposes in comprehending and implementing statutes. Interpretation involves understanding and discerning the meaning of language as an art form. Lawmakers use words and phrases when drafting statutes to convey their intentions and establish rules. However due to language complexities and multifaceted nature of matters statutes may not always express their intended meaning with clarity. Consequently, courts play a role in interpreting language to uncover legislative intent.

The objective of interpretation is to address questions about what the law states and what it was intended to achieve. It delves into context, purpose and objectives of the law to determine the intent, behind its wording. Judges meticulously analyse the wording, sentence structure and organization of the statute to understand its intended meaning.
When it comes to the law construction focuses on how it’s applied to specific cases or situations. Once the court has understood the meaning of a statute the next step is to put that meaning into action, in real life scenarios. This is where construction comes into play.

CONSTRUCTION

Construction deals with implementing and enforcing the law. It involves adapting the language of statutes to address circumstances and determining how the law should be enforced in cases. Through construction courts decide how to put the law into practice in order to resolve disputes protect rights and ensure justice.

The main difference between interpretation and construction lies in their scope and emphasis. Interpretation primarily aims at understanding and revealing intent while construction involves applying that intent to situations. Interpretation provides guidelines, for construction by establishing boundaries within which courts can consistently and fairly apply the law. In practice interpretation and construction are closely connected. The court’s interpretation of a statute influences how it constructs its rulings in cases. Hence, we can also safely assume that the outcomes of case laws will be a crucial part in interpreting future statutes.

OBJECTIVES OF INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES

The goals and objectives which interpretation of statutes seeks to be achieved can be summarized as follows;

• 1. Understanding the intent of the legislators: The main goal of interpretation is to comprehend what the lawmakers intended when they made and passed a law. This involves analysing the language used in the statute taking into account its context and examining the circumstances surrounding its creation.
• 2. Achieving the purpose for which the statute was brought into force: Once we have determined the intent the next objective is to ensure that the statutes purpose is fulfilled. This means interpreting it in a way that aligns with the goals intended by lawmaker.
• 3. Protecting rights and freedoms: Statutory interpretation should also prioritize safeguarding individual’s rights and liberties. It entails interpreting laws in a manner that does not unreasonably infringe upon people’s rights and freedoms, but rather help them
  In addition, to these objectives there may be aims to certain cases. For example, a court might interpret a statute in a way that minimizes its impact, on the economy or promotes welfare.

AIDS TO INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES

Statutory interpretation can be a complex process due to inherent ambiguities and varying legislative intent. To aid in accurately understanding statutes, legal practitioners and courts rely on various tools known as “aids to interpretation.” There are statutory as well as non-statutory aids: –

A) Statutory Aids:

• These include additional information provided within the statute itself, such as definitions, explanations, schedules, and other provisions. In State of W.B vs Anwar Khan, the court relied upon on the statutory aids within the legislation to determine the legislative intent and constitutionality of the WB Special Courts Act of 1950.
• Preambles: Introductory statements that precede a statute and provide context and background. In The State of Rajasthan v. Basant Nahata (2005), the Supreme Court of India relied on the preamble of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, to understand the law’s purpose and combat corruption.
• Marginal notes: Marginal notes are notes that are sometimes placed in the margins of statutes. These notes can provide helpful summaries of the key provisions of the statute.

B) Non Statutory Aids:

To interpret and understand laws there are non-statutory sources that can be consulted:

• 1. Legislative History: This includes records of debates committee reports, speeches made during parliament sessions and other related materials that led to the law’s enactment.
• 2. Dictionary Definitions: Standard dictionaries can be used to determine the meanings of words within a statute. For example, in R v. Harris (1836) the court relied on definitions to interpret the term “steal” as defined in the Theft Act 1968.
• 3. Case Law: Previous court decisions serve as precedents. Provide guidance for interpreting statutes ensuring consistency, in reasoning. In the landmark decision of Mahalaxmi Oils Mills, v. State of A.P. the SC observed how the term “tobacco” was defined in law by the lawmakers. Interpreting the law led the SC to state that tobacco encompassed all types of tobacco regardless of whether it was cured/uncured, produced or not as the stems and leaves of the tobacco plant. The Court concluded that this definition was comprehensive but did not include tobacco seeds.

IMPORTANCE OF INTERPRETATION

The process of understanding the meaning of a law or legal provision is known as interpretation. It is an aspect of our system enabling courts and other bodies involved in adjudication to apply the law to specific cases and resolve legal disputes fairly.
Interpretation plays a role, in preventing the exercise of power and ensuring that duties are fulfilled. If a statute is written in ambiguous language government officials may interpret it in ways that allow them to wield their powers arbitrarily. However when courts interpret statutes they can ensure fair application of the law while preventing abuse of power by government officials.

Interpretation is also instrumental, in preventing crime and safeguarding welfare. If criminal statutes are interpreted narrowly they may not effectively deter crime. Conversely if they are interpreted broadly individual’s rights may be violated. Courts have a role to play in interpreting statutes in a manner that both prevents crime and safeguards individual rights.

Lastly interpretation contributes to expediting the delivery of justice. If the courts struggle to promptly and accurately understand the law it can result in delays, within the proceedings. Such delays can have effects on both plaintiffs and defendants eroding trust in the judicial system. To guarantee justice courts should establish consistent guidelines, for interpreting the law.

RULES OF INTERPRETATION

There are so many rules of interpretation used in law.

• Literal Rule: This rule is the most basic rule in interpretation, which states that words, in a law should be given their ordinary and plain meaning unless it would lead to an absurd or unreasonable outcome.
• Golden Rule: Another rule is golden rule which is departure from the literal rule, which allows courts to modify the meaning of a law in order to avoid absurd or unreasonable results. However this rule is only applied when the literal meaning of the law is clear and unambiguous.
• Rule of Harmonious Construction: The rule suggests that laws should be interpreted in a way that aligns with laws to prevent conflicts between them.
• Mischief Rule: It permits courts to consider the problem or issue that a law was meant to address when interpreting it. This helps ensure that the law remains true, to its purpose.
• Purposive Approach: This rule focuses on understanding and interpreting laws based on their intended purpose.
• Ejusdem Generis Rule: It states that when general words follow a list of words they are limited to the category or class as those specific words.
• Noscitur a Sociis Rule: This rule states that meaning of a word or phrase can be determined by the context provided by surrounding words or phrases.
• Expressio Unius Est Exclusio Alterius Rule: This rule suggests that mentioning one thing implies excluding another.
• Presumption of Consistency: The principle of consistency asserts that laws and legal documents are assumed to be, in agreement with each other. This assumption is made to prevent any contradictions between laws or different sections, within the law or document.

CONCLUSION

Interpreting statutes is an intricate responsibility, within the system. It plays a role in enabling courts and other adjudicating bodies to apply the law to individual cases and resolve legal disputes. These guidelines are designed to ensure consistent application of the law maintain its relevance and effectiveness and uphold justice. In addition to these rules and principles lawyers also utilize external aids for interpretation. These aids assist lawyers in comprehending the meaning and purpose behind a statute allowing them to determine its interpretation. Interpreting statutes is undoubtedly complex but undeniably vital, within our system.

FAQ

1. What is the interpretation of statutes?

Interpretation is the process to determine the meaning of the statutes or other legal provision. Statutes are also known as legislative enactment or backbone of any legal system. This interpretation of statues is challenging and complex but this is the most important part to ensuring that, law is applied fairly and uniformly.

2. What are the two kinds of interpretation of statutes?

Two kinds of interpretation of statutes are: Literal interpretation and Purposive interpretation

3. What is golden rule of interpretation?

Golden rule of interpretation is, which allows courts to modify the meaning of a law in order to avoid absurd or unreasonable results. However this rule is only applied when the literal meaning of the law is clear and unambiguous.

4. What is the purpose of interpretation?

i) To determine whether a particular conduct is prohibited by law
ii) To determine whether a government agency acted lawfully

5. Who interprets the statutes?

Statutes are interpreted by courts, including trial courts, appellate courts, and the Supreme Court.

6. What is the famous case of interpretation of statutes?

Mahalaxmi Oils Mills, v. State of A.P. the SC observed how the term “tobacco” was defined in law by the lawmakers. Interpreting the law led the SC to state that tobacco encompassed all types of tobacco regardless of whether it was cured/uncured, produced or not as the stems and leaves of the tobacco plant. The Court concluded that this definition was comprehensive but did not include tobacco seeds.

There are various books that we read and keep back at their places and then there are books that we read and find our home in it. Now, decoding what you have to read can be a tough thing. When it comes to the legal arena, lawyers have to read a lot and law is somewhat notoriously complicated, so to know where to start with and what to start with becomes essential.

It is important to keep your reading simple as well as interesting when you are starting to explore a subject. For that reason, here in this blog one will get a list of the best 10 books that every law student should read.

The list will focus mainly on the books that would guide you through and would show you what law is all about, without actually hurting your brain. After reading these books, you will get an idea about how law revolves around our daily lives.
Let’s begin then.

THE DECISIVE TOP 10 BOOKS FOR LAW STUDENTS

1. Nani Palkhivala : The Courtroom Genius by Soli J Sorabjee and Arvind P Datar

Nani Palkhivala has been the legend of the Indian Legal Arena. After a phenomenal academic career, he was quick to become India’s most renowned lawyer and remained in the top spots for five decades. He remained famous for his amazing power of concentration and for his persuasive advocacy. He had created a reputation for himself as a fantastic constitutional lawyer. All of the major landmark cases between 1965 and 1995 were argued by him.

“Nani Palkhivala : The Courtroom Genius” by Soli J Sorabjee and Arvind P Datar, shines a light on Palkhivala’s journey as a lawyer, discusses the landmark cases on which he had appeared, and how these cases changed the future of the country forever. This book interestingly describes his working methods along with his style of advocacy. Of course, law students shouldn’t miss this gem of a book but apart from law students, every chartered accountant, member of the judiciary, and any well-informed citizen of the country shouldn’t miss the opportunity of reading this book.

2. Legal and Constitutional History of India by Justice M. Rama Jois

Justice M. Rama Jois is a Rajya Sabha Member currently and is also a Senior Advocate at the Supreme Court of India. Justice Rama has been a successful author of several phenomenal books. He was the former Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court and has also been the former Governor of Bihar as well as Jharkhand.

“Legal and Constitutional History of India” by Justice M. Rama Jois was published for the first time in the year 1984 as the first volume of the Legal and Constitutional History of India. It covers the ancient Indian legal, judicial, and constitutional systems. The book was subsidized by the Government of India through the National Book Trust for the betterment of the students. Its second printing was released in 1990 which was also subsidised. The book not only covers legal history but also has Indology, Sociology, and Political Science.

3. I’ve Been Around for Some Time by Raju Ramachandran

“I’ve Been Around for Some Time” is a beautiful compilation of selected articles and interviews taken by Raju Ramachandran in leading national newspapers, magazines, and law journals. In the 40 years of his remarkable career, he has written on several constitutional and legal developments that captured the socio-legal underpinnings of contemporary society as well as suggesting reformist measures.

The book has a wide range of topics covered, from the independence of judiciary, the manner of judicial appointments, the need for judicial rectitude to the concept of constitutional tort, challenges to parliament democracy, to the latest issues of lawyer’s strikes.
The articles are thought-provoking and show the evolution as well as lack thereof in different areas of the legal arena.

4. Landmark Judgments by Universal

As the title suggests, this book consists of selective landmark judgments by the Supreme Court of India. Each judgment has been presented in a comprehensive manner. It has all the essential ingredients to help the reader to understand in a better way. As it covers all the landmark judgments from different spheres of law, it becomes absolutely convenient for the readers to take references. The book adopts a lucid and straightforward approach that helps the readers to get to the point immediately. It has innumerable resources for students who aim towards competitive examinations.

5. Indian Constitutional Law by M.P. Jain

M.P. Jain’s magnum opus on the constitution of India has changed the entire scenario of the country along with the development of the Constitutional Jurisprudence in our country. He has served and has been serving generations of judges, scholars, lawyers, students, and normal people too.

This edition of the book “Indian Constitutional Law” by M.P. Jain remains loyal to the original approach of the author. The edition also comes with various critiques on several topics like the immunity of personal laws from Article 13, exclusion of decrees from civil court, sovereign immunity, etc. The book also contains a rich stream of contemporary jurisprudence areas of disability rights, indirect discrimination, and evolving constitutional principles.

6. Letters to a Law Student by Nicholas McBride

This book has been declared as one of the top books for a law student to go through. The book is completely filled with sage advice. Anyone who has a keen interest in making a career in law should definitely read this book to get information regarding how to go for the profession.

The book is developed as a series of letters to a law student named Alex. The first chapter begins when Alex decides whether he would do law or not and the last chapter is when Alex is about to graduate. Thus, the book covers a journey of law school life. From choosing law to graduating is what the book reflects upon.

7. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee

Harper Lee was born in the Alabama town of Monroeville. After graduation, she wrote several student publications and gave her time for a humor magazine as an editor. She did not complete her law degree and moved to New York in the year 1950 and worked as a reservation clerk with Eastern Air Lines and BOAC.

This book became an instant bestseller and was acclaimed as a critical hit. It’s an unforgettable novel filled with compassion, drama, and life lessons. The book went on to win the Pulitzer Prize in 1961 after which it was also converted into an Academy Award-winning film. The book got the tag of a cult classic. Although Harper Lee considered her book as a simple love story, today it is regarded as a masterpiece of American literature.

8. The Indian Constitution : Cornerstone of a Nation by Austin Granville

The Indian Constitution : Cornerstone of a Nation by Austin Granville lays down a rich history of the Indian Constituent Assembly. The book covers a journey of how and why the respected members of the Assembly wrote their constitution as they did. This latest edition of Austin’s classic work has a preface that aligns with the contemporary developments in constitutional law.

9. Before Memory Fades by Fali S. Nariman

This book is a comprehensive and perceptive autobiography. It’s a candid and compelling book that revolves around the formative years of the author when he had the golden opportunities to interact with many eminent judges and advocates. He dealt with a wide range of important subjects such as the sanctity of the Indian Constitution and attempts to tamper with it, crucial cases that brought revolution in the Indian Constitution, and so on. Due to his phenomenal track record, the Government of India nominated him to the Rajya Sabha. His book can be highly resourceful for legal professionals and any reader in general.

10. Bleak House by Charles Dickens

Bleak House opens in the foggy twilight of the London City where fog grips the city densely. The book revolves around the case of Jarndyce and Jarndyce where the inheritance is slowly devoured by legal costs. Dickens gave a lively portrayal to his book and showed London’s society in a way no other novelist ever had shown. Bleak House is magnificent filled with comedy and is often considered as the best of Dickens.

CONCLUSION

Thus, these were the top 10 best books that every law student should go through once in their lifetimes. These books have been authored by some of the most genuine, intellectual, creative, and highly knowledgeable personalities. These books would change the perspective and the approach of students who wish to get into the law sector.

FAQS

1. What books should law students read in India?

Ans – There are many important books that every law student should go through once. Some of them are:-
• Landmark Judgments That Changed India.
• We, the People
• The Case that Shook India: The Verdict that led to the Emergency
• Nani Palkhivala: The Courtroom Genius
• Before Memory Fades: An Autobiography
• The Rebel: A Biography of Ram Jethmalani

2. Which is the best Constitutional law book in India?

Ans– There are quite a few books that are considered to be the best Constitutional Books in India. Like, as H.M. Seervai’s Constitutional Law of India, V N Shukla’s Constitution of India, DD Basu’s Introduction to The Constitution of India, M.P. Jain’s Indian Constitutional Law, and so on.

3. Which is the best Criminal Law Book in India?

Ans– A few Criminal Law Books that are considered to be the best in India are, K D Gaur’s Textbook on Indian Penal Code, Ratanlal & Dhirajlal’s The Indian Penal Code, PSA Pillai’s Criminal Law, and so on.

4. From where can I buy books for law students?

Ans– There are two ways through which a law student can buy books. The first and easiest way to purchase law books is by ordering them through an online law bookstore like LexisNexis, where they can find every law book, they need in one place and at the best price. Alternatively, they can simply visit their nearest bookstores.